So i figured I'd ask for opinions. Heres a list of preferences:

car or truck
98 or newer
Cheap to insure
less than $9k
good mpg
cheap to make go fast or has good performance out of the box(car) or..
can move out of its own way(truck)

i know some of thats oxymoronic asking for a cheap fast car....but i dont want to be driving some POS that cant move out of its own way.

reason im in the market, just got kicked out of the house and my truck with its shittiness, high mileage, and crappy mpg wont be cutting it.

Fucking sucks. :dunno:

How about a 98 Acura Integra GSR with 100K or so. It meets some of those requirements.

__________________

acura= honda. i remember that much..but integra= accord? or civic?

More of a civic

__________________

ford focus 2.0 Zetec or Duratec, honda civic or prelude, acura integra

ford ranger 4.0, toyota tacoma, chevy s10

__________________
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
My 1973 Mustang Mach 1 with a 429
http://www.cardomain.com/ride/2526283

My lug nuts require more torque than your honda makes

I guess SVT Focus kind of goes out the window on insurance :dunno:.

Neon

cheap, handles well(at least the 1st gen ones do, don't know about the 2nd gen),insurance is low, plus they have quite a large performance aftermarket.

__________________
THUNDERHORSE

had a neon. never again

whys that?

__________________
THUNDERHORSE

Civic SI... Integra (already mentioned)

__________________

because theyre cheap. i dont like them.

+1. neons suck ass

__________________

for a cheap, easily tuned performance car, the Neon is one of the best out there.

__________________
THUNDERHORSE

yeah thats true... if one wants a car which gives excellent performance and is cheap too then , the first name which comes to mind is neon.